About time. Industries should stand on their own merit and shouldn't get handouts from the government because they're in states with early primaries. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-farmers-love-still-want-214653933.html (Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump’s "I LOVE YOU!" tweet to farmers is facing another challenge: Budget cuts that will slash subsidies for crop insurance and small growers. Trump’s 2020 budget, released Monday, calls for a 15 percent funding drop for the Department of Agriculture, citing “overly generous” subsidies. The president is seeking one of the largest-ever cuts to domestic discretionary spending in a $4.7 trillion fiscal 2020 budget proposal that also boosts defense spending and adds $8.6 billion for building a border wall. The plan would trim the USDA budget by $3.6 billion to $20.8 billion, lowering subsidies for crop insurance premiums to 48 percent from 62 percent, and limiting subsidies for growers who make less than $500,000 annually. In December, the president tweeted, “Farmers, I LOVE YOU!” On Monday, the National Farmers Union criticized the White House budget proposal, saying, "It’s time the president’s policy proposals and rhetoric acknowledge the financial pain in farm country.” The budget blueprint, which forecasts annual deficits extending beyond the next decade and rising national debt, represents a wish list for the president’s priorities that is certain to be ignored by Congress. “The Trump budget has no chance of garnering the necessary bipartisan support to become law,” said Nita Lowey, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee. Farmers comprise the bedrock of the rural base of voters that sent Trump to the White House. That constituency found itself caught in the cross-hairs of Trump’s trade war with Beijing after China slapped retaliatory tariffs on U.S.-grown crops, including soybeans. The Trump administration responded with a plan to authorize as much as $12 billion in aid, but even prior to the ruckus between the world’s two largest economies, American farmers were dealing with low prices and a decline in incomes wrought by bumper crops. Trump’s budget “proposes that USDA responsibly and efficiently use taxpayer resources by making targeted reforms to duplicative programs and overly generous subsidy programs,” according to the document. In speaking at the American Farm Bureau Federation’s conference in January in New Orleans, Trump said that he was “proud to be a great friend of the farmer, of the rancher” and those in that profession. “We are very disappointed that the president takes the position that he does, but many of these cuts were discussed in the ag committees of both the House and the Senate when they put together the farm bill, and they were rejected,’’ said Gene Paul, legislative coordinator at the National Farmers Organization. “Crop insurance is probably more important now than ever because of lower farm incomes and tariffs put in place by the president’’ Paul said. “The president just doesn’t get it.’’’ --With assistance from Erik Wasson and Justin Sink. To contact the reporters on this story: Mario Parker in Chicago at mparker22@bloomberg.net;Alexandra Semenova in New York at asemenova10@bloomberg.net To contact the editors responsible for this story: James Attwood at jattwood3@bloomberg.net, Reg Gale, Patrick McKiernan
Too early to get worked up or happy about his bullshit proposals. We'll see what the actual budget is when he signs it.
In any case, farmers will still vote for him en masse. The master keeps kicking the dog but Rover merely slinks to a corner until lulled back over with morsels of white identity politics, "they kill babies", and "Pelosi is the anti-Christ".
I guess he no longer worries about the impact of his easy to win tariff wars... or the votes from the farm areas...
Economic theory says so. But, in an international commodity market trading in essentials for life that has many players engaged in anti-competitive practices, can you really just go with economic theory?
