GP Kidd Francis Davis A Miller Cassell (when healthy) Bibby Nash Marbury T Brandon (when healthy) I hope I didn't miss nobody....
1. Stevie Franchise 2. Payton 3. Nash 4. Davis 5. Kidd (overrated he has a good team around him) 6. Marbury 7. Miller 8. Cassell 9. Bibby 10. Brandon
1. Kidd 2. Payton 3. Davis 4. Francis 5. Nash 6. Miller 7. Stockton 8. Marbury 9. Cassell 10. Bibby. DaDakota
1. Payton 2. Kidd 3. Baron 4. Andre Milla 5. Stockton 6. Bibby 7. Franchise 8. Nash 9. Cassell 10. Marbury
All of you who don't have Stockton in your list are morons.. lol... best PG, not overall player.. he should top all list.. I'm not sure if the rest of you guys put them in order of what you think, bur stockton at 10? 8? you must be crazy... he's a better PG then Francis..
Well glory b, da funk's on me beeyatch!! I gots my very first ignore candidate....you at da top my list b!!! I finally got a list right!!!
I don't like the Jazz, but don't be ignorant to the fact that he is one of the best point guards of all-time..
i don't understand how anyone would not have payton top 3 atleast. kidd is way overrated but he's also darn good. 1. payton 2. kidd 3. francis 4. nash 5. davis 6. brandon 7. miller 8. marbury 9. stockton 10. cassell
Criteria : fg%, a-to %, total a, a/game. also steals - total, per g, s v to. Pg skills. Not athlete/character/leadership rating. 1A. Miller 2Payton 3Kidd 4Stockton 5Davis 6Brandon 7Marbury (Dammit - I hate him) 8Tinsley (very good stat year) 9Nash 10Cassell 11 Bibby 12 Francis ? 13 M Jackson 14 J Williams 15 Mc Innis 16 NVE 17 D. Armstrong 18 A. Williams 19 Stodemire (ugh) 20 Strickland (double ugh) Now you guys adjust for leadership and presence and all that. I Still like the top 5, but you could adjust francis and bibby up a lot and starbury, tinsley down a lot. Brandon Cassell injury bug, leadership ?s. Stockton, M Jackson age adjust ? going forward. Mc Innis, D. Armstrong, A. Williams show better than I expected. Super ugh adjust bottom two.
Very good stat ranking, may I suggest that you adapt the ranking with the team win/loss ratio and with stats of the other teammates: For example productive share of the PG out of total team production. So that : for example , Francis would benefit greatly from production share but would loose a lot from the win ratio. The ranking should really be modified interestingly. You would at least see the most efficient players. The last argument standing would be the quality of the PG teammates, indeed the production share can be interpreted both ways: - if very high: I'm so good, my teammates suck and i have to do everything on my own (or I'm a selfish brat) - If very low, my teammates have a greater influence on the game statwise and I only distribute and call the game in a very smart way. Inverse the ratio depending on the assumption you make here. multiply all ratios and you have a good final stat ranking
01. Kidd 02. Payton 03. Nash 04. Miller 05. Bibby 06. Stockton 07. Cassell 08. Parker 09. Francis 10. Davis 11. Marbury 12. Brandon Watching a guy like Nash play makes me want the Rockets to go after someone like Dickau-- if he is the third coming of Stockton/Nash.
