meh , the comparison to children isn't accurate,nor does any Justice to the Israelies, i see it more like forcing homeowners to have the adorable hamsters or the peaceful turtles as their only choice of pets Thanks @JuanValdez
@Exiled Too far. This is more dehumanizing anti-semitic sentiment than it is political opposition to the state of Israel. If that was unintended, please edit. Otherwise, people will be hitting that Report button, including me.
It was about the law not the people, anyone can support Israel apartheid regime as much they like , just don't enforce it upon the public Speaking of dehumanizing, what about Harvey's victims who would not get their relief fund unless signed a declaration of not boycotting Israel?
One problem is how far down the line does it go? What if the supplier of a supplier of a supplier is a "participant" in the BDS movement?
I thought the reference might have been unintentional, but I'd still prefer it if you'd delete it altogether. Regarding the Harvey victim thing, it was a misapplication of the law by one city, and it's been fixed, so I've read. This law would not require any private citizen to do anything. It's still a bullshit law, but we don't need to mischaracterize it to make it look bad; it can look bad all by itself.
For some reason I thought maybe the company got some product from Israel and that boycotting Israel would make doing business with the company impossible.
