By mentioning the Washington Post and neglecting to mention it is an opinion piece - it implies that it is coming from the editorial staff versus a columnist. I am not stating your intention, just the net effect of your post.
I'll try to say this as nicely as I can. I'm usually very careful with my language. Here again is what I said: "more impeachment appreciation in the Washington Post". Now focus on the preposition in. "In" the Washington Post. Not by the Washington Post. Not by the Editorial Board of the Washington Post. In the Washington Post.
I for one one am in impeachment withdrawal. Lucky for me, the Criminal in Chief does crimes all of time and his next impeachment is a question of if not when. Go Trump. Don't keep us waiting!
What's the point of making fun of democrat politicians? I don't trust most politicians regardless of party. But there are levels of trust. Was Perez officially charged with anything nefarious with regards to Iowa? Was there a "perfect" phone call transcript where he asked to do something that might be a disadvantage for Sanders or Yang? I like Yang - I'd love to know how exactly he has been screwed by DNC in Iowa. You sound emotional and unclear - it's hard to understand what you mean and where you are coming from in your previous couple of posts here.
I'm looking forward to season two. Can I fast forward thru the voting process? Too boring and I got work to do when I'm not binge watching
Out of curiosity, what compels you and other adults to use words like Demonrats, libtards, Hitlery, Obummer, etc?
I suspect also pity the cluster **** in all of the Republican primaries, so Trump is "rigging" that system.
