Wilson is a pure dart throw and playing him would be chasing points IMO. Your RBs are god-awful. I don't know if you can be helped at this point.
Didn't have to throw salt on the wound. JK But yeah I know I'm in deep crap so I'm needing a hail mary every week. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If I were you, I would sell high on Michael Thomas and try to trade him in a 2 for 1 deal. You trade Thomas and get back a WR2 and RB2 for instance.
Sat Goff on my PPR team and sat Cooks on my standard team. My benches continue to be Super Bowl bound... But probably don't feel as bad as someone in my standard league that dropped Goff and picked up Manning. At 8:23pm this evening.
I started Goff over Wilson this week. Feeling pretty good about that. Also had Thielin. Good start to the week.
sat cook and murray. good sits of the week. however, i have to start wilson this week, so hopefully you regret it
Starting Matt Ryan over Goff. ATL is supposed to be in a shootout with CIN (I have Dalton starting in my other league). And started JuJu Smith-Shuster (vs BAL... but its frickin' JuJu, can't sit him) and Emmanuel Sanders (vs KC) over Cooks. Couldn't put him at Flex (starting James Conner there). Hard to say I really made bad decisions, despite what happened. MIN had only given up 100 yard game last year... gave up 3 last night. Guessing MIN defense is no longer elite. And/or LAR offense is unstoppable.
Ajayi, Lamar Miller or T. Coleman for my RB2 this week? I have Coleman in the lineup right now as he is the projected to score the most but I am leaning towards starting Miller actually on Sunday.
Bengals were roasted last week by McCaffrey who isn't even a very good inside runner, so I would tend to lead toward Coleman.
I would just stick with Lockett. I think Baldwin is a game time decision. He might be on limited minutes or likely reinjure himself anyways.
How wrong would it be if my opponent only has one QB right now which is J Garrapalo (who tore his ACL) if I were to pick up and drop the 3 remaining QB's available in my 14 team league? They would all be on waivers and he would not then have a starting QB? I mean I wouldn't really do it. But it would be funny as hell and would I assume piss some people off for sure.
LOL. You know both sides of the question: "Go for it, its within the rules, and making moves that help you win." Versus, "Yea, its within the rules, but isn't good sportsmanship". I know if the past I have picked up a player more to keep away from my opponent. Even this week I held onto a player up until I knew waivers would make him unavailable, even dropping another player for a move I wanted to make. Heard a fantasy sports writer say "better on your bench than in your opponents starting lineup".
