1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

A different perspective: Odds of lotto pick becoming Howard caliber vs Howard staying

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by meh, Jul 13, 2012.

  1. meh

    meh Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    15,388
    Likes Received:
    2,261
    I feel the general sentiment is that if the Rockets have to give up everything for Howard, then we're getting fleeced. I thought this at first too. But how about think of it a different way. Instead of looking at what we are giving up, think of how difficult it is to obtain a player of Howard's caliber via draft.

    To make a comparison, we look at how many game-changing, team-carrying superstars have been available for drafting.

    Lebron
    Wade
    Chris Paul
    Howard
    Tim Duncan
    Derrick Rose
    Kevin Durant

    Using Duncan as the cutoff point, that's 7 players in 11 years from 1998 to 2008. Discounting more recent drafts as players haven't reached their potential yet. Generally, a crappy team get a top-10 pick. They may get lucky and get into the top-3, or suck very very bad for picks 4 and 5. But top-10 is a good average for crappy teams. So you're looking at 110 top-10 picks during this span, with 7 of them turning into franchise superstars.In other words, if you suck enough to be a perennial top-10 lottery pick team, you have ~6.4% chance of getting a Dwight Howard-caliber each year on average.

    So yes, there's a chance that Dwight Howard won't sign. And he cost a lot more money. And you have to take on bad contracts. But had the Rockets tanked instead in the past two years, the odds that they get a franchise superstar would've only been ~13%. If the odds of Howard staying is even at a third, 33%, that would be like skipping 4+ years of sucking. All for the price of taking on some lousy contracts and one lottery pick that's mostly top-3 protected(superstars dropping out of top-3 are rare).

    tl;dr version: If Morey is even somewhat, kind of, maybeish, sort of confident that Dwight Howard will re-sign, it would be worth it to throw away everything we built up the past years for this guy. Because the risk by going the other direction isn't really that low either.
     
    4 people like this.
  2. Mr. Clutch

    Mr. Clutch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    46,550
    Likes Received:
    6,131
  3. iconoclastic

    iconoclastic Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    6,100
    Likes Received:
    422
    Not only that, but Howard leaving bumps our draft picks up, as we'll be historically bad after we empty the cupboards after the trade, and we'll gain equity in that way as well, compared to the #4-12 picks we'll have with the semblance of talent already on the roster.
     
  4. Outlier

    Outlier Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    1,342
    Instead of "U Mad?" it should be "U Scared?" to those cowards afraid to pull a deal for Howard.
     
  5. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    13,634
    Likes Received:
    14,682
    Meh, I respect your analysis, and I think you make a very good point. But let me ask a question: what was the last team to win a championship that didn't start by drafting a franchise player? And draft night trades don't count cause that's like trading for a draft pick and then drafting the guy you want. Has there ever been a team that acquired their franchise player mid-career through trade like this, and it ultimately yielded a championship? A team that didnt already have an allstar they drafted on the roster? I can't think of any.

    Just to clarify my point, i'm saying that virtually no team has won a championship without drafting a star first
     
    #5 Aruba77, Jul 13, 2012
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2012
  6. poing

    poing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    45
    2004 detroit pistons
     
  7. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    I don't think that's relevant. The Heat, Celtics and Lakers all had superstars they drafted. But they didn't become championship teams until they traded for another star, whether it was Shaq or Garnett or Gasol or Lebron. In fact, more often than not, it was the traded star who made the bigger impact.

    So in the past, the model was draft one superstar and trade for another. That works. But why not just trade for both?
     
  8. panamamyers

    panamamyers Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2000
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    You are putting a lot of caveats into the question as you go there as to be sure and exclude the Lakers and Heat.
    All of the Lakers championships of the last 15 years are directly related to acquiring a big name piece in a trade. The Shaq trade got them the first three, the Gasol trade the last two. I'll let you have the original caveat of a draft night trade, but there is no reason to not include teams that already had a star.
    Both Heat championships were directly related to getting a big name star through free agency.
     
  9. Outlier

    Outlier Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    8,519
    Likes Received:
    1,342
    So are you saying there's some kind of special benefit for those franchise players who stay with the team that drafted them causing them to win championships? Are you saying there's a kind of negative vibe on stars who get traded for in their prime? A franchise player is a franchise player. And we are getting one with Dwight. Period.
     
  10. komac

    komac Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    0
    If this trade goes down, the Rockets will be the new Orlando Magic... freaking Houston Magic! So absolutely nothing will change for Howard, why in the world will you think he'll want to resign here?

    This board has gone absolutely crazy, jeez...
     
  11. K-Low_4_Prez

    K-Low_4_Prez Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,453
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    Thank you!!!

    All I have been doing in this other thread Is taking heat!
     
    1 person likes this.
  12. K-Low_4_Prez

    K-Low_4_Prez Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,453
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    We arnt in Orlando that's why!!

    Bazinga! He doesnt care about winning (he would be in OKC right now if he did) so I don't think it matters he just wants to move!
     
  13. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    13,634
    Likes Received:
    14,682
    Perhaps the quintessential example of a championship which was won without a superstar (the only example i can think of). But they did draft Richard Hamilton, who was a 3-time allstar.
     
  14. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    13,634
    Likes Received:
    14,682
    Very good point. I don't necessarily disagree, but all I'm saying is that it hasn't been done before.
     
  15. K-Low_4_Prez

    K-Low_4_Prez Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    7,453
    Likes Received:
    1,340
    The NBA Is not the same!!

    "The Decision" changed the game!
     
  16. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    13,634
    Likes Received:
    14,682
    Perhaps I misspoke. I know the lakers and heat acquired big-time stars through trade, ultimately winning championships, but they had franchise players they drafted first.
     
  17. anthony59237

    anthony59237 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,296
    Likes Received:
    234
    they traded for him.
     
  18. poing

    poing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    45
    rip was drafted by the wizards.
     
  19. panamamyers

    panamamyers Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2000
    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    1,192
    Yeah, but my point was that you were putting too many caveats into the statement. First you started out saying that no team had never built around a trade piece. Then after you typed that sentence, you remembered Kobe was traded to the Lakers, so you threw in the caveat of draft day trades don't count. Then you remember, wait a minute, Shaq was traded for by the Lakers, so then you threw in the caveat of they couldn't have a star on the tea already.

    Just too many caveats to the statement at that point to make it much of a worthwhile statement to make.
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    13,634
    Likes Received:
    14,682
    My bad. Terrible oversight. But as Detroit is pretty much the exception to the "superstar = championship rule" I think you still get my point.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now