Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
The city of Seattle, Washington, agreed Wednesday to pay $10 million to settle a lawsuit from a group of Black Lives Matter protesters who...
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/snail-bar-robbed-oakland-crime-police-18626014.php?sid=639dd066a27ce8ac0b0bafbc&ss=P&st_rid=null&utm_so...
are there, or are there not, laws on the books that require the federal government to provide a secure border?
more Spartaci: [MEDIA]
Virginia is Spartacus. [MEDIA]
you are simultaneously arguing that only the feds can secure the border, and that the federal government does not have the authority to do so...
if Abbott can enforce the law, surely the feds can as well. does not require a new law.
please, state precisely what SCOTUS "ruled."
illegal immigration is one issue. securing the border is another. the former is a consequence of the failure to do the latter.
we shall see. Abbott was also the Texas AG, and a justice on the TX Supreme Court. he may know what he's doing.
you are, of course, focusing on the wrong problem.
Oklahoma is Spartacus. [MEDIA]
[MEDIA]
we don't need new laws; the problem is not enforcing laws which are already on the books.
**** just got real. [ATTACH]
what does this even mean?
he's responsible for securing the border, or not. he has chosen the latter path.
immigration crisis.
the current crisis is entirely of Biden's doing.
Honest question: does the Court's decision mean Texas cannot install more razor wire? ...or just that the feds can cut it down, should they wish?
