Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Idk I feel good. His fastball is at like 90-91 apparently.
Love it when the close ones go against you
lol “completely different” - wow, yep definitely no parallels in the two situations at all. I think the topic has been sufficiently addressed.
Ha, ok, sure it isn’t.
They rely so heavily on their pen... we saw how that worked out last year in the WS for the Dodgers. Overused pen running on fumes by the end...
What are you talking about? I havent called for anything. All I’m doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of the Democrats for taking such a hard ass...
You fail to grasp my point I think. Of course the SC nomination is political. What I was saying was the use of the #WeBelieveSurvivors movement...
There was a national hysteria surrounding Kavanaugh and the accusations against him. The whole #WeBelieveSurvivors movement was launched. As far...
So now the excuse is Ellison isn't important enough? Ha, I figured we'd get there.
Keep running from the point. I know the hypocrisy of the situation is going to be hard for you to justify and reconcile.
You didn't even know Ellison has two accusers and you're attempting to speak authoritatively on the subject? :rolleyes: Good grief. Ellison has...
Clearly the point sailed over your head. It's not a battle over which party has more or less prominent domestic abusers/sexual abusers. Both...
They didn't play too terribly in Boston last year... idk what the temp was but they won one and were competitive in the other. *Edit - apparently...
Oh wow, that's adorable. The "we sacrificed Al Franken" so that "buys" us political currency when the next scandal occurs. As if, that's how it...
Democrats don’t care about women. They only care about women if the alleged abuser is a Republican. It’s all politics. The whole thing was merely...
Yea, I mean if you take out the entire month of May, the month with the largest sample size, hitting .192 with a 6.86 OPS he was setting the world...
Because I was attacked in a condescending and d*ckish way even when my memory wasn't exactly wrong. Just some fanboys get excessively defensive...
Well that's on you for assuming things and not getting clarification before acting on those assumptions isn't it? "Not setting the world on fire"...
I didn't assert he was doing poorly. I asserted he "wasn't setting the world on fire" - there is a big difference.
Even if you are, you don't have to be condescending and a d*ck about it. I said, "as I recall" - if I recall incorrectly, I recall incorrectly but...
