Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
I thought he wanted John Lucas. So many different theories, so much speculation. Part of me thinks that all this stuff is media-manufactured...
So these people are counting on Trump voters to not understand how math works, I guess.
Part of the problem might be that I'm just not following this story all that closely, so some of the context she's assuming her followers would...
Not sure if its just me, but I have a very difficult time parsing this reporter's tweets. Wish she didn't rely on short-hand so much.
You're right.
Don't you think it will be easier, politically, for Republicans to do exactly that, if they are essentially in agreement with a conservative...
Thanks. I'll read up on this later. It may change my mind.
I don't disagree with your last sentence, but I think they do have a stronger case with an explicit, direct rejection from the USSC. It makes the...
For local state elections, none really. We are talking about Presidential elections.
I'm not totally satisfied with them simply losing cases in lower courts. The USSC is the highest court in the land, with the power to overrule the...
Here is the TX case: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf I'm not a lawyer, but...
Whether a rebuke from the USSC does much help or not, I don’t see it as doing more harm than them just remaining silent on it. Bad legal theories...
USSC conservative justices are much higher profile and are more respected. A strong rebuke of the Trump team’s argument from them will make a...
You are implying in your self-contradicting question that Trump’s lawyers are my team. And you expect me to answer? Why should I if you’re just...
The heart of the disagreement is you think a formal statement validates the legal case, while not making a statement helps to invalidate it and...
I disagree with the premise of your question, that a legal argument must be “strong” for the SC to write an opinion on it.
I get that. But even where the legal case appears flimsy, as in this case, I’d argue that under extraordinary circumstances of considerable...
“Legally doesn’t merit a hearing”? What does that mean? What merits a hearing according to the law and constitution?
You were literally arguing in that thread that the SC should not give such an official opinion, and are now trying to say that I made up that Dems...
The only one whining here is you.