Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
Clyde, Barkley and Hakeem?
Very true. That was a mistake. Can't excuse that really.
At 15 million with a trade kicker, Parsons is a negative value contract. He'd be damned hard to trade in general, much less for a 3rd star....
He was shredded by Batum.
Agreed... but, I'll be damned if it doesn't hurt.
I'm not so sure about that. Ariza is a step up on the defensive side of the floor. He's the type of stopper you have to have next to a guy like...
Ultimately, Parsons would have been a burdensome negative value contract. You have to maintain flexibility to make a contender.
Totally.
Yep, paying a role player a max level contract is awesome.
Damn.
I doubt Miller wants to sign with the Rox if they already have Parsons and Ariza at SF.
Miller was great last year, but can you count on that again? If yes, I'd agree with you.
I'm a scorpio. Can you tell me what the rest of this month holds for me?
I always thought of that as a failure on D'antoni's part.
We still need a 4 that won't get absolutely shredded by the LMA's of the world.
Lol, thanks Clutch. Guy must write horoscopes for a living.
Remember when we played Asik and Dwight together? Just imagine that, but in this case, Asik can consistently drain 15-20 footers.
Howard's $100 mill contract was most definitely based on potential.
This reminds me of the Orlando Rashard Lewis contract or the Juwan Howard contract. Parsons is solid, just like those two, but he'll never be a...
What's his twitter handle?
