Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!
In English, we capitalize sentences. Ohhh, this is fun. Shall we continue this irrelevant exercise?
If you really want to even the playing field then perhaps you should shoot Zimmerman.
So that's all you have left now? Rather than actually holding onto your weakening position, you attack grammar. Nice to know where you stand....
We had a good interchange back/forth where you asked good questions ...and I answered. Then after laying the wood, you dropped off the planet...
Lol. Point being that the neighborhood did not have any authority to tell him to not carry a gun.
Except that Zimmerman wasn't appointed by his neighborhood so nobody had any authority to tell him to not tote a gun. He was acting alone.
You cannot use probilities to prove a case. You have to use the facts given and you outlined those. We have no evidence to suggest Martin...
You are correct in that Number 1 will certainly be disputed in court ...as it should be. So lets not argue the outcome of a trial by jury as that...
You don't need a high burden of proof to make an arrest ...you only need resonable suspision. Burdon Of Proof is a legal term used in court...
It's called circumstatial evidence. Very very few cases have perfect evidence. If they did, we wouldn't really need a court to decide, right?...
Is it a stretch because you don't agree? Just quoting the website. Which part is a stretch?
It doesn't really matter exactly what Martin thought (esp since we can't know that). Here is another quote for that site: "If you carry a...
We have no proof of that. In fact, we have testimony to the contrary. Nevertheless, a "fight" does not justify the use of deadly force when...
Here's an interesting website dedicated to the concept of self defense: http://www.useofforce.us/4details/ It does not directly cover...
I was not aware that "who started it" was in dispute. It's already a fact that Martin didn't start the altercation. We have Zimmerman in his...
I have yet to hear anybody offer an alternative explanation to the basic facts of this story. Why is it self defense if Zimmerman initiated the...
Per your own description ...it's basic human nature to introduce bias. Your attempt to be PC after the fact is irrelevant. The whole point you...
...and you, being a human also subject to the same consequences, have displayed your full array of biases. Including: 1. Referring to the...
immaterial. Zimmerman initiated the confrontation. Immaterial. Race is not a relevant legal factor to the case that will be tried in the state...
Franchise, it is irrelevant if Martin was on top or bottom. If you pick a fight with somebody and get beat up, that isn't grounds for self defense.
