No Mention of al Qaeda or Plot to Attack U.S. in Padilla Indictment

So tigermission, I'm guessing you're OK with people providing support to terrorists and conspiring to murder people overseas? Hopefully you haven't been attending that Mosque in Ohio....

 

All fluff no substance texxx brings forth another gem.

 

sometimes i wonder if texx and trader are real people.

 

and your ok with putting people in jail for 2-3 years who are US citizens caught in the US and never charging them as enemy combatant? all the while having no oversight?

how american.

 

As long as they are a Muslim or person of dark skin, I would imagine he would not pipe up. Unless of course it was not a Republican doing the evil.

 

I was reading something about this and the problem with charging Padilla with conspiring with Al Qaeda and planning to use a dirty bomb is that the defense could then call Khalid Sheik Mohammed and Zubaydah to testify which would raise a ton of problems for the US government regarding how that information was gotten out of them.

 

The government is not above the law. If they are accountable, they should be held as such.

 

This government isn't so much above the law as they are getting around the law. You can't hold someone for a few years years without letting them see a lawyer and expect to be able to use anything he's said in court.

 

And why not?

 

Reading comprehension should be a requirement for posting in this forum.

 

Thanks, RM95. (for those that are wondering what I'm talking about -- he's logging in under Major's account b/c he is prohibited from accessing the D&D under his own account. He was banned.)

Should donating to the website be a requirement for posting in this forum?

 

Congratulations on showing continued ignorance of all topics within this forum - even the ones you try to create because of your inability to stay on topic in threads.

 

Is he Iraqi?

 

Answer this question --
Are you RM95 logging in under Major's account?

 

Nope, never has been. Nice try, though.

Ignorance is bliss, though, so I'm sure you'll continue this argument again and again when you have nothing of value to say, which unfortunately, is pretty much 100% of the time.

 

Well, that is a lie. You two have shared accounts during high traffic periods because only contributing members can access the BBS during those times (and Major hasn't contributed). Clutch called you out on it, in case you forgot. I believe this led to a ban for at least one of you for a period of time.

I strongly suspect you are lying about the answer to my question as well. Major, for as much as I disagree with him, typically has well reasoned posts. You (RM95) on the other hand, typically have one-line posts which are pretty much devoid of any substance (except anger).

 

If you were trying to catch me in a lie, you did a terrible job phrasing your question. I have logged into RM95's account. He has never logged into mine. Your desperation is quite sad.

I no longer have the patience for your inane posts. You don't be get serious arguments out of either of us anymore - you're simply not worth it. You have no interest in real discussions, so you won't get them.

 

Nice, so you basically admit that if the question were phrased differently then your answer would have been different. Thanks for the confirmation, RM95.

 

Because the charge he is being presented with is no less harmful/serious/grave. Aiding terrorists, be it with a dirty bomb or otherwise, is treasonous and in my opinion worthy of the death penalty.