1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

so far, how correct was pop?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by smoothie, Aug 1, 2003.

  1. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947
    im not comming down on the guy. thats not what this thread is for.i just want to see how much of what he said happened and what we have left to look for?


    first off, he said we were talking to "clippers players".

    -thats true. we signed one of them. the other one is either out of our price range or we changed our minds i guess.


    second, we were supposed to add a vet PG and SG from the east, and a PF from the west. this is where things get screwy.

    -a vet SG from the east? we signed one form the west? so i guess we are'nt still looking for one in the east. could he have been talking about that push we made for spree?

    -so i guess e are still looking for a PG from the east and a PF from the west. the PG from the east could've been armstrong. there was lot of talk about him comming here, but i guess he too was out of our prce range.


    i still dont know why we are looking to add a PF, or why we are interested in stephen jackson, and why posey wasnt resigned. from pops last post all of that doesnt make sence.....
     
  2. Sane

    Sane Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2000
    Messages:
    7,330
    Likes Received:
    0
    He told us what they were talking about, not what was definitely going to happen.

    What everyone needs to understand is, he may have just been told a deal is done, but that deal could get dismantled immediately. It's just the natire of trade talks, they can break down for the silliest reasons at any moment.

    He's just the messenger. Let's be greatful.
     
  3. Nero

    Nero Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    6,448
    Likes Received:
    1,430
    PG from the east = Charlie Ward ?
     
  4. land_sharks

    land_sharks Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2002
    Messages:
    500
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pop's post was pre-JVG, right? I doubt they were looking at Ward at the time Pop posted it, as his JVG ties are what would bring him here.

    SG from the East should have been Barry, but Pike works nicely too.

    And he was speculating based on his inside scoop. He was not definitively stating the actions that would occur, other than we'd be bringing in vets, vets, vets. That was my understanding anyway.
     
  5. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,496
    Likes Received:
    15,989
    He posted that before Rudy got canned. When he did get canned, didn't Pop say to forget everything he said before? The changing of the guard changed the whole offseason.
     
  6. F.D. Khan

    F.D. Khan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    11
    Maybe the PG from the west was Kevin Ollie, who the Rocks were supposedly after. He signed with the Cavs over us though.

    The SG from the east could have been a number of guys, but I think we were pretty close to getting Spree, but whether that was a JVG part or not I don't know.

    PF from the west??? I have no idea. But you never know, people are still talking all over the west and it not over yet.
     
  7. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,725
    Likes Received:
    2,041
    I think you're mixing up your insiders - I think this prediction was from the MIA Doc. Unless I'm mixed up myself.

    p.s. anyone heard how OP is doing?
     
  8. verse

    verse Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    5,860
    Likes Received:
    626
    nope. you're correct. Doc Rocket predicted the SG, PG from the east and PF from the west acquisitions. and he's been, well, dead wrong.

    OP predicted the "mobley packing his bags and headed for pussyland" along with rice being traded this offseason. and he's been, well, dead wrong.

    i still appreciate the info, though. sometimes things just don't work out.
     
  9. Relativist

    Relativist Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    241
    so does Doc still have his connections with the staff changes? Or is OP our only inside source now?
     
  10. Nolen

    Nolen Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    2,723
    Likes Received:
    1,268
    Only so far. Remember, we have a lot of trading/signing time left.
     
  11. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    40,319
    Likes Received:
    33,312
    It all depends on whether those sources were related to the former assistant coaches. If so, they are no more.

    Come to think of it. Maybe we'll have a new batch of "insiders" giving scoops for us with the new coaching staff. Let's hope.
     
  12. verse

    verse Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    5,860
    Likes Received:
    626

    in a way, that's already happened. tigereye's prediction % has been, well, at 100% to my knowledge. same goes for DCballer. those two have already been right more times than DocRocket or oeilpere, as far as i know. of course, that's not a knock on Doc or pop, since they have had more opportunities to be wrong simply based on their longevity at cc.net.
     
  13. JoeBarelyCares

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2001
    Messages:
    6,725
    Likes Received:
    2,041
    I agree. The info is great, and a ton of fun to read and speculate on, even if things subsequently develop differently. The scoops shouldn't be viewed as prophesy, but should be recognized as hearsay information from a given snapshot in time.
     
  14. rockbox

    rockbox Around before clutchcity.com

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2000
    Messages:
    23,467
    Likes Received:
    13,523
    The vet SG from the East was probably Sprewell which we were trying to get until the last hour before the big trade.
     
  15. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,492
    First of all, anyone who says these guys were "dead wrong" is mostly dead wrong. Ninety percent of the time they're conveying what's being discussed or worked on -- no one can guarantee it will actually go down and most of the time they haven't tried to do that. No one here has any reason to think Doc or pops was "wrong" when they say things were being discussed. It never ceases to amaze (and annoy) me when people try to tear down our insiders here. They don't need to post here, most of us appreciate it when they share stuff with us and the vocal minority of doubters jeopardize that.

    One recent exception where our insiders WERE wrong was the Doc Rocket thread people are talking about here, in which he did say some things would definitely happen. He said Rudy was definitely safe and he bordered on saying Cat, Griffin, Moochie and Tito would definitely be gone. I think he also said we could expect Rice to be traded by summer's end. But, of course, all that was out the window once Rudy got canned (and please spare me the cover of him quitting - he didn't), and Doc said so. He also broke the Rudy story, in case anyone doesn't remember. He was wrong initially about the Rudy thing, but so was everybody else. I ran into Jim Boylen a couple weeks before it went down and he told me the whole coaching staff would definitely be back. Les changed his mind. Kind of silly to shoot the messenger.
     
  16. verse

    verse Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    5,860
    Likes Received:
    626
    Batman Jones,

    you're right. they probably are the "messenger" and i have never doubted the credibility of their messages. never.

    my statement was only that they were "dead wrong" about the outcome...but that is NOT their fault. i understand that. IOW, i was speaking moreso to their "ms. cleo" abilities than their "reporter" abilities. as "reporters/insiders/folx in the know" they are and have been always 100%. their "ms. cleo" abilities, though, have been hit-or-miss. no shame in that.
     
  17. verse

    verse Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    5,860
    Likes Received:
    626
    oh, and don't be so defensive.

    anyone who's posted in the GARM long enough knows i've never been one to question the credibility of our "insiders". don't lump me in with the group of doubting thomases....


    ...and damnit, come over to the GARM more often. i know the hangout is intriguing, but your thoughts, insight, and intellect are welcome and appreciated over here as well, BJ.
     
  18. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,492
    Thanks for the kind words, verse. I didn't mean to single you out at all and didn't even scroll back up to see who'd said 'dead wrong.' It's just a pet peeve of mine when people bash or try to poke holes in DR and pops' posts. Didn't mean to say you were doing that. I enjoy your posts as well.
     
  19. haven

    haven Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 1999
    Messages:
    7,945
    Likes Received:
    14
    Anyone got an inside scoop about Popeye's illness?

    If he comes back in full health, I think he should make a triumphant return in his old nick. Oeilpere is too annoying to spell :mad:.

    *crosses his fingers*
     

Share This Page