Spurs consider bidding for Stoudemire

what assets? manu's 10mil expiring? it's not as attractive as tmac 23mil expiring so whatever they can get, we can get. they have little to no chance of making a move that of any significant consequences.

 

Expirings, Hill, Blair, Mason, Bonner. We? To us guys like Brooks and Landry are huge. Blair and Hill the Spurs can cut lose with no regret.

 

But he is black?

 

You're overestimating Steve Kerr.

 

He is not trading Stoudamire to the Spurs, of all teams, if he does not want to be lynched.

Seriously, the idea that Stoudamire could be a Spur of all teams is laughable, and from my perspective would be something like sending Yao to the Jazz. It won't happen in a thousand years.

 

I believe Splitter was the reason the Spurs were willing to trade Scola, apparently he's a really solid and young prospect. However didn't Splitter snub the Spurs and the NBA altogether? I thought he didn't want to come here and would rather stay in Europe instead? Did he have a change of heart?

 

Anyone remember how he traded two first round picks to OKC just to get rid of Kurt Thomas? OKC then turned right around and traded Thomas to the Spurs for another pick. LOL was that a great move or what?

 

Thank you, Ziggy! Morons from our board plan on trading Brian Cook and TMac for Chris Bosh, and act like the Spurs don't have any assets? Get real, guys. The Spurs have been amongst the best at picking up talents late in the draft for years. They have plenty to offer (outside of Duncan, Manu, Parker) if they are looking to upgrade.

 

Man, I've been hearing about this Splitter guy for years now. This guy better be the real deal. Well, if he ever actually makes the jump to the NBA, that is.

 

so the spurs have 47ish million tied into 3 players and you want them to trade the rest of their team?

if they do that, theyll have to pull something fierce out their ass to get solid players like blair from somewhere. not likely to happen

 

I don't see why Phoenix would be willing to do such a trade?

Manu is more effective with the ball in his hands and that would create issues with Nash plus who are they going to play as their inside presence. Don't see it happening. The Suns are just about ready to rebuild, Nash is on the decline and the whole system needs fresh blood.

 

http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/nets/swamp_gas_HjII1Dvq2MUsLZXlYoreEN

 

He's a one way player who doesn't deserve a max contract(but will likely get one)

 

I'm no Amare homer but I can't agree with this type of faulty logic. Evidently, this person has never seen a Nash/Amare PnR that teams have no idea how to stop 90% of the time. That or he simply doesn't understand how a PnR works -- that having a strong screener/finisher is equally as important has having a playmaker initiating the whole sequence in the first place. People like to act like you could plug Brian Cook in at PF next to Nash and he'll go off for 20 a night. Why is it so hard to look at Amare and say, "He's easily one of the most dangerous scorers in the league -- Nash or no Nash. He has has flaws, he won't play defense and he isn't the coldest beer in the fridge, but offensively few can put the ball in the basket the way he can. It doesn't matter who his PG is." Instead, it has to be this "....he NEEDS Nash, nothing without Nash, blah blah blah" type of crap.