It's sad I actually spent my time & money reading his book 'The Age of Turbulence'.... I want a refund!!!!
I think I'd rather hear what other economists or even better other Central Bankers think before making any strong judgement, particularly a negative one. My call? C- on bank regulation, B+ on interest rates. Outside of any of the federal budgetary positions, this is still probably one of the hardest jobs in government: with a low margin of error, several other Fed Governors and Fed Bank Presidents with input and influence on his decisions, too many external variables; and yet he still maintained relatively continuous economic growth.
Greenspan on policing derivatives. Gee I dunno, Greenspan, how about regulators that don't have big bonuses at stake? From Business Week, September 29, 2008 issue.
Mr. Libertarian, a personal friend of Ayn Rand. He brought us to this point, with his bubbles and bias against sensible regulations of the finanancial markets.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/fed/2004-02-23-greenspan-debt_x.htm Posted 2/23/2004 11:39 AM Updated 2/24/2004 2:13 AM Greenspan says ARMs might be better deal By Sue Kirchhoff and Barbara Hagenbaugh, USA TODAY WASHINGTON — Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said Monday that Americans' preference for long-term, fixed-rate mortgages means many are paying more than necessary for their homes and suggested consumers would benefit if lenders offered more alternatives. In a standing-room-only speech to the Credit Union National Association meeting here, Greenspan also said U.S. household finances appeared generally sound, despite rising debt levels and bankruptcy filings. Low interest rates and surging home prices have given consumers flexibility to manage debt, he said. "Overall, the household sector seems to be in good shape," Greenspan said. Americans have been buying homes and refinancing mortgages at a record pace in the past several years, lured by low interest rates. Most mortgages are fixed rate, so consumers can prepay when rates go down but do not face higher costs if rates rise. Under adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), which made up about 28% of mortgages in January, borrowers usually have lower initial rates but face the risk of higher payments if rates in the broader economy rise. While borrowers can refinance fixed-rate mortgages, Greenspan said homeowners were paying as much as 0.5 to 1.2 percentage points for that right and the protection against a potential rate rise, which could increase annual after-tax payments by several thousand dollars. He said a Fed study suggested many homeowners could have saved tens of thousands of dollars in the last decade if they had ARMs. Those savings would not have been realized, however, had interest rates shot up. "American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgage," Greenspan said. Joseph McKenzie, deputy chief economist at the Federal Housing Finance Board, says buyers like the stability of fixed-rate mortgages, but there is increasing flexibility in products. "There are lots of innovative programs, especially targeting low-income and first-time buyers," he says. The Mortgage Bankers Association said the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage in the week ended Feb. 13 was 5.46%, compared with 3.27% for a one-year ARM. Mark Zandi of Economy.com says that although Greenspan is technically correct, for some borrowers, including those with high debt, fixed-rate mortgages may be a better bet.
