1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. ROCKETS GAMEDAY
    Big West matchup for the Rockets as they play the Timberwolves in Minnesota Wednesday night -- Wolves missing Anthony Edwards and Ayo Dosunmu (late scratch). Come join Dave and Chron.com's Michael Shapiro for live postgame!

    LIVE! ClutchFans on YouTube

Boo On Sandra

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by Jeff, Dec 18, 2000.

  1. Jeff

    Jeff Clutch Crew

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    22,412
    Likes Received:
    364
    Ugh!

    O'Connor bemoaned news of Gore victory
    Copyright 2000 Houston Chronicle News Services


    NEW YORK -- Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor declared "this is terrible" during an election-night party when she heard Florida was first called for Vice President Al Gore, Newsweek magazine reports.

    Quoting two eyewitnesses to her comments Nov. 7, Newsweek said O'Connor then walked off to get a plate of food, and her husband, John, explained to friends and acquaintances that she was upset because they wanted to retire to Arizona and a Gore presidency meant they would have to wait another four years because she did not want a Democrat to name her successor.

    Newsweek noted that O'Connor had no way of knowing when she let her guard down that five weeks later she would play a direct and decisive role in the election of Gore's Republican rival, Texas Gov. George W. Bush.

    Not long after Florida was called for Gore, news organizations retracted the call and said Florida was too close to be awarded to either candidate. The state was then called for Bush, but again that call was retracted and the race remained in limbo for five weeks.

    O'Connor, 70, had been Republican majority leader of the Arizona State Senate before being appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Reagan in 1981. The magazine said in its edition due out today her remarks would likely fuel criticism that justices "sought to influence" election returns in their ruling that ended the election impasse.


    ------------------
    The way to use life is to do nothing through acting,
    The way to use life is to do everything through being. - Lao-Tzu
     
  2. Kim

    Kim Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 1999
    Messages:
    9,378
    Likes Received:
    4,308
    This is what I've learned from my POLS book:

    The supreme court is influenced by politics as much as the legislature and president's office. It has, however, the highest approval rating of the three and also the highest level of public ignorance towards it. This is how the system works though, and is supposedly good.
     
  3. TraJ

    TraJ Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 1999
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    2
    I guess she'll get her wish. It's fortunate for her that the law of land demanded what she herself wanted, otherwise she might have been tugged between the two.

    ------------------
     
  4. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    Justices routinely wait for someone with their same political stripe to come to power before retiring. And it is certainly understandable that a Justice who wants to retire would be upset over the prospect of not being able to retire until later if she wants her successor to be of the same political stripe.

    That doesn't mean that she or anyone else on the court cannot make decisions based on the facts of the case. Even had she not been considering retirement, would O'Connor's decision been any different in these recent cases? Probably not.

    ------------------
    Houston Sports Board
    The Anti-Bud Adams Page
     
  5. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    66,796
    Likes Received:
    34,410
    Mr Paige

    The world may never know

    Rocket River

    ------------------
     
  6. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,446
    mrpaige,

    I don't know about her, but numerous political scholars have stated that Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas' decisions all went against how they would normally vote in judicial restraint cases.

    ------------------
    "He was under more balls than a midget hooker."-Bobby Hill

    visit www.swirve.com

    and, http://www.geocities.com/clutch34_2000 for great Rocket insight by some of your fellow BBS posters!
     
  7. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    I guess that depends on how you look at the case and how you define judicial restraint. Scalia, Thomas and Rehnquist are the polar opposite of activist Justices. They choose to interpret the law very narrowly. By allowing recounts to extend past the Congressionally mandated deadline would've been acting in a activist way and would've been quite different than what we usually see from the three.

    Since there were conflicting issues, either way those three Justices voted would've been contrary to the ways they often vote.

    It all depends on which way you frame the issues involved.

    ------------------
    Houston Sports Board
    The Anti-Bud Adams Page
     

Share This Page