1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

One German who gets it

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by bigtexxx, Feb 17, 2005.

  1. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,925
    Likes Received:
    2,265
    This was written in the respected German publication, Die Welt. A great piece by all standards.

    Europa - dein Name ist Feigheit


    EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE

    (Commentary by Mathias Dapfner CEO, Axel Springer, AG)

    A few days ago Henry Broder wrote in Welt am Sonntag, "Europe - your family name is appeasement." It's a phrase you can't get out of your head because it's so terribly true.

    Appeasement cost millions of Jews and non-Jews their lives as England and France, allies at the time, negotiated and hesitated too long before they noticed that Hitler had to be fought, not bound to toothless agreements.

    Appeasement legitimized and stabilized Communism in the Soviet Union, then East Germany, then all the rest of Eastern Europe where for decades, inhuman, suppressive, murderous governments were glorified as the ideologically correct alternative to all other possibilities.

    Appeasement crippled Europe when genocide ran rampant in Kosovo, and even though we had absolute proof of ongoing mass-murder, we Europeans debated and debated and debated, and were still debating when finally the Americans had to come from halfway around the world, into Europe yet again, and do our work for us.

    Rather than protecting democracy in the Middle East, European appeasement, camouflaged behind the fuzzy word "equidistance," now countenances suicide bombings in Israel by fundamentalist Palestinians.

    Appeasement generates a mentality that allows Europe to ignore nearly 300,000 victims of Saddam's torture and murder machinery and, motivated by the self-righteousness of the peace-movement, has the gall to issue bad grades to George Bush... Even as it is uncovered that the loudest critics of the American action in Iraq made illicit billions, no, TENS of billions, in the corrupt U.N. Oil-for-Food program.

    And now we are faced with a particularly grotesque form of appeasement....How is Germany reacting to the escalating violence by Islamic fundamentalists in Holland and elsewhere? By suggesting that we really should have a "Muslim Holiday" in Germany.

    I wish I were joking, but I am not. A substantial fraction of our (German)Government, and if the polls are to be believed, the German people, actually believe that creating an Official State "Muslim Holiday" will somehow spare us from the wrath of the fanatical Islamists.

    One cannot help but recall Britain's Neville Chamberlain waving the laughable treaty signed by Adolf Hitler, and declaring European "Peace in
    our time".

    What else has to happen before the European public and its political leadership get it? There is a sort of crusade underway, an especially perfidious crusade consisting of systematic attacks by fanatic Muslims, focused on civilians, directed against our free, open Western societies, and intent upon Western Civilization's utter destruction.

    It is a conflict that will most likely last longer than any of the great military conflicts of the last century - a conflict conducted by an enemy that cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures, which have proven to be, and will always be taken by the Islamists for signs of weakness.

    Only two recent American Presidents had the courage needed for anti-appeasement: Reagan and Bush.

    His American critics may quibble over the details, but we Europeans know the truth. We saw it first hand: Ronald Reagan ended the Cold War, freeing half of the German people from nearly 50 years of terror and virtual slavery. And Bush, supported only by the Social Democrat Blair, acting on moral conviction, recognized the danger in the Islamic War against democracy. His place in history will have to be evaluated after a number of years have passed.

    In the meantime, Europe sits back with charismatic self-confidence in the multicultural corner, instead of defending liberal society's values and being an attractive center of power on the same playing field as the true great powers, America and China.

    On the contrary - we Europeans present ourselves, in contrast to those "arrogant Americans", as the World Champions of "tolerance", which even (Germany's Interior Minister) Otto Schily justifiably criticizes. Why? Because we're so moral? I fear it's more because we're so materialistic, so devoid of a moral compass.

    For his policies, Bush risks the fall of the dollar, huge amounts of additional national debt, and a massive and persistent burden on the American economy - because unlike almost all of Europe, Bush realizes what is at stake - literally everything.

    While we criticize the "capitalistic robber barons" of America because they seem too sure of their priorities, we timidly defend our Social Welfare systems. Stay out of it! It could get expensive! We'd rather discuss reducing our 35-hour workweek or our dental coverage, or our 4 weeks of paid vacation... Or listen to TV pastors preach about the need to "reach out to terrorists. To understand and forgive".

    These days, Europe reminds me of an old woman who, with shaking hands, frantically hides her last pieces of jewelry when she notices a robber breaking into a neighbor's house.

    Appeasement? Europe, thy name is Cowardice.
     
    #1 bigtexxx, Feb 17, 2005
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2005
  2. AroundTheWorld

    AroundTheWorld Insufferable 98er
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    68,752
    Likes Received:
    46,193
    He's a pretty smart guy. I sat next to him on a plane very recently. I agree with his article.
     
  3. Aceshigh7

    Aceshigh7 Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    258
    That is an excellent article. Bravo Mathias.
     
  4. SWTsig

    SWTsig Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,947
    Likes Received:
    3,551
    very good read. i found myself agreeing with a lot of what he said. i may not be the biggest Bush supporter, but i do believe he's trying to do what's best.
     
  5. glynch

    glynch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    17,792
    Likes Received:
    3,395
    Given the history of Germany in the twentieth century, what is so surprising to see a German militarist or two around who advocates the strong man approach and sees negotiations with Muslims , and trying to understanding them as "appeasement" and being an "old woman with shaking hands".

    I could see Hitler using the same appeal.
     
  6. Mango

    Mango Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 1999
    Messages:
    7,552
    Likes Received:
    1,984
    I can't see it.


    <a HREF="http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Grand-Mufti-of-Jerusalem"> Grand Mufti of Jerusalem</a>

    <a HREF="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/muftihit.html">The Mufti and the Führer</a>

    <a HREF="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/mufti2.html">The Mufti’s Conversation with Hitler</a>
     
  7. AroundTheWorld

    AroundTheWorld Insufferable 98er
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    68,752
    Likes Received:
    46,193
    You have it all twisted. Muslim extremists are comparable to Hitler. You, on the other hand, compare those who want to fight extremism to Hitler. That is just stupid.
     
  8. glynch

    glynch Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    17,792
    Likes Received:
    3,395
    Actually both sides are extremists. Tariq Ali has it right it his book enitled "The Clash of Fundamentalisms.".

    Fighting Al Qaeda in a reasonable and intelligengt fashion, fine, since they attacked us. Invading Iraq, being imperialists, no. Using Al Qaeda and Muslim extremism to level cities, kill hundreds of thousands in an oil grab, no.

    History will show that it was just another imperialist oil grab.

    Bin Laden is another matter. Our reaction is sort of like leveling Munich or Rome or wherever because of the Red Brigades. Stupid and an overreaction. That isn't what we are really doing , but of course, it was a pretext for imperialist saber rattling and an ol grab.

    Sorry, Bush is not to be praised on Iraq nor on his reactoin to 9/11. At this point the majority of the American people and certainly the vast majority of the world including the Germans know this, too. You guys are entitled to your rapidly dwindling minority opinion on this issue, of course.
     
    #8 glynch, Feb 18, 2005
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2005
  9. No Worries

    No Worries Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    30,159
    Likes Received:
    17,103
    One German who gets it

    while the rest do not. What are the odds?
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now