His numbers will cool down but he's still going to be a solid player. People saying that they'd take him over Ingram are absolutely insane.
Chandler Parsons 2.0. Waiting for the douche saga where he joins the Celtics for the max and talks trash about the dirty city of Los Angeles and the Lakers only to get injured and never be relevant again.
You need to relax with this post with the " what in the world theme" lol you just wanted to make a post lol cause it's not that serious
His game is perfect for the direction the NBA has taken over the last 3-4 years with pace and ball movement. He is the rare guy who has a skill set limited by the college game.
He surprised me a bit too. He didn't stand out in college amongst other in the draft, was on a weak team, solid rebounder, decent scorer, didn't seem to have much defensive potential, shot didn't look too developed though it was there. Once he was at the NBA draft combine, he showed his athleticism in his measurements and drills, he also stood out in the combine games. He looks very good, his skill level, ball handling, jump shot, touch around the basket, athleticism and decision making have all been top notch. He reminds me of Gallinari, but Kuzma's a bit more of true 4 then him.
Legit player. He gave his "theory" on why his 3 point shot has been better... and its because the line is farther back and there's more space in the NBA. Said in college it was close enough that he often would get out of form not thinking about needing to be technical on his shot. Whereas with the deeper three he is forced to get his body into it more technically sound. And just more space. If he could defend and board, he'd be a classic stretch 4. But I think he's best suited at the 3. Definitely strikes me a Chandler-esque in his ROckets peak.
