Who would make for good moderators in the D&D forum?

That's why it would be a mistake to attempt to censor content rather than just preventing personal attacks in a situation like the D&D. The more subjective you make things, the more room for abuse you allow.

 

This is correct.

 

I meant internet content moderators in general, not Clutchfans in particular

 

Great comeback!

 

...he does show some potential, doesn't he?

 

Also not taking away from JV, but I agree 100% re: Os and have also suggested Durvasa. (I am not as familiar with the others' posts but trust Deckard's views on this.)

 

According to my tracker that is the first emoji JuanValdez has ever used.

 

@Os Trigonum is okay in my book!!

 

To Mods: Here's a visual example of disrespect that should be OK during debates.



That's not very nice, but everyone laughs, and the victim can't really complain.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018...-hill-criticising-israel-181130061452765.html

Some good stuff here

(Edited: wrong link)

 

The inphormant is obsessed.

 

We've talked **** about Catholicism, Islam, Evangelism, Judaism, Mormonism (not sure about the Buddhists and Hindus and Shintos, but why not?)

Never been a problem

This is just a weird thing to bring up as if it's a constant issue, but sure, never been a problem

"Thought crimes"? Really? And who are these "most moderators"?

 

George Orwell and his Children?

 

I stoped by here to see comment about the passing of GHW Bush but see I’ve been mentioned a few times.
Thank you for nominating me as a meditator but I don’t want to be one and would be a terrible one. Biggest thing is I don’t have the time to do it and to be a moderator would be a significant input of time to do it right and half assing it would just make things worse. Also as someone who does like argument and debate I wouldn’t feel it fair to be both an active debater while also holding the power to censor that debate.

 

i don't have any suggestions but please somebody put that mueller thread back on track

 

there's gotta be some kind of metaphor here

 

I am against anyone who thinks @Nook's post in the Mueller thread about @cml750's religious beliefs was actionable.

 

Say what to the who now?

 

Just saying that if a person believes Nook's post about cml750's beliefs being less than objectionable is worthy of a moderator taking action, then I wouldn't support that person as a moderator.

 

I could be wrong, but I haven't seen anyone indicate that moderator action was necessary. I was kind of hoping that our own improved behavior was removing the need for one.