Then you prolly mean 8. Because if parts have to be traded for same amount of parts, should still be 8. thx.
Feedback time. I share it with you from Mr. Plowman Pls chime in.......go with one position would be my answer.
@Plowman can you specify the question? In the end, you have to put him at a position in your starting five but you can explain your strategy to us. So if you for example say he'll be your ballhandler but start at SG and then defend SFs(similar to LeBron and other point forwards), that would be okay. We just have to understand your thought process. But if you for example say he'll be your starting center, it will be difficult for us to believe.
That's versatility, I would have taken him in Round 2 or Round 3. Still think you should fixate on 1 primary position from which you can defend or handle the other 2 positions and go back and forth
edit: It's difficult for a rookie though, he has been injured and the sample size is a small one. 26 games in his career.
Usually yes, but these point forwards are very difficult to put into a corset and it makes sense to use them in a versatile manner. If someone tells me he'll start Bron at SF, use him as a ballhandler and then defend PFs, I have no issue with that and understand the strategy. Or if you have someone like Diaw/Anthony Mason starting at C, being a ballhandler and defending PFs/SFs.
Sure during one game or two. But Diaw can't do it at all at once. He has to position himself in the middle, then go back and bring the ball up and then strut to the Pf, then Sf to guard them. If he clones himself yeah,.
Breh mostly camped at the 3pt line and high-post though, he wasn't your classical C in the paint and quick to come back on D. The better point forwards did this most of their career and switched all the time on defense, you'll rarely ever see them stick to one defensive assignment in a game.
I know I meant he had 15 years career to play those positions but when we judge a matchup we judge it in the format of an NBA Playoff Game. So we should split his minutes up, let's say 30 minutes a night. he gets 10 minutes at C, 10 minutes at PF, and 10 minutes at SF or PG. I know your thinking but for me it's clearer that way. For you or someone else multi tasking is probably doable but it's not easy to describe. It's very hard to judge for some guys.
I know you guys are likely going with the old Judging system but I will implement the New Jontro Version. 5 pts for O, 5 pts for D and so on.
Yea we will definitely do that one and try to come up with the best categories. And PS: I think no one likes the old system, seeing how it always ends in a war.
Will be easier when the actual matchup starts and the guys can tell us how they'd utilize their guy for specific player matchups on both ends.
