Trump Expected to Pull Out of Paris Climate Agreement

It is very important and they are now trying balance it with quality of life. I've already demonstrated they are taking the steps to make coal more expensive through pollution reduction on coal fired plants.

No one truly educated on the matter thinks you can develop an economy entirely with wind and solar energy, it's just adding it to the energy mix.

Ok, and how has this affected Germany? Have they lost economic output because electricity is too high?

Is it? Or they just reporting on Germany since they took the biggest step out of any major developed country?

India is a country with huge solar potential since most of the country is sub tropical or desert with a lot of sun light along.

That's impossible since each generation of new solar panels are more efficient and those panels will eventually be replaced unless they develop a lot of nuclear or some un-commercialized renewable energy source comes along.

And there's lots of pushback against coal induced smog and air pollution. That particulate matter is especially damaging.....

You are confusing the issues with implementing solar and wind energy which all have very clear and easy steps to fix.

 

proven unreliable = false

bobby proven unreliable and not knowing what he talk about way too often = true

 

You don't know what you are talking about kiddo, but that's not really anything new. When it comes to climate models, you usually hear the same thing when the reliability is questioned and that'll be first a "Of course they are reliable" and then something to the effect of "they are getting better and better all the time. You know, kind of what you'd expect to hear. The truth of the matter is that they can be accurate, but given the ridiculous number of variables involved there will always be a margin of error involved and it is something that will constantly change as new information comes in.

Now that's not to say that there isn't any value to climate models, quite the contrary actually, they are very valuable....you just can't fool yourself into thinking that they are more than just a prediction that is always subject to change. The further out you try to predict, the less reliable your model is likely to be.

 

bobby proven unreliable and not knowing what he talk about way too often = true

it's a fact

 

I'm sure you think so killer. Given your credibility, you'll understand if I don't exactly lose any sleep over your ignorant opinion. Let's face it, if you knew what you were talking about, it would be a first.

 

Let's face it, you put me on ignore....

 

The funny thing is that even some of the most conservative Republicans in the senate like Ben Sasse agree that climate change is real and manmade. He has the most conservative voting record in the senate! Yet these numbskulls are still to the RIGHT of him!

 

What science and math background do you have in mathmatical modeling? Ever taken a DiffyQ or statistics course?

 

Pretty sure sasse is considered a rino and traitor at this point

 

Yeah, but was that in the Bible?

 

Yes... he did say this in France:

 

... and he also said this:

 

Your picture didn't dispute anything and you chose to cite an article from 1896 to contradict one from 1912. You choose older data to override more recent data. The article you cited doesn't even end in a sentence since it's cut off and ruins your mic drop even more. With your logic, you're saying, "Here, let me take a screenshot of an article that is incomplete and doesn't say anything and claim I won. Derp!"

Further the guy you chose to quote rebutts your climate denier rhetoric.

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Arrhenius/

But good job bro. The guy you quoted believed in man made climate change. You really dropped the mic hard!

 

And you're...

 

This has been another crackpot roho production.

 

What does this mean?